Possibly Correct

EP #54 | Socialism: Scientific or Religious?

While communist/socialist/social democratic have always had a scientific-pseudoscientific verneer about it, time has worn away much of this verneer, exposing much of the ideology as hyper-idealistic/proto-religiousist in many regards. Despite this verneer being largely washed away, many if not the vast majority of communists/socialists refuse or cannot see their views as anything except entirely rational. In this podcast, Professor Stephen Hicks delves deep into this phenomenon.

Read More

EP #141 | The New Order of Fear

The newly released book “The New Order of Fear” is a fictional thriller that warns of the upcoming violence due to the emerging Great Reset. While fictional, the book is based on real world intelligence, terrorism and political issues.

Read More

EP#10 | Victim or Complainant?

Criminal Defence Lawyer Joseph Neuberger and YouTube personality, legal researcher and host of the UnTrue Crime podcast Diana Davison, sit down and discuss the aftermath of their trials and the emerging and alarming changes to our legal system. A behind the scenes inside look into real court room drama. In this episode Diana, Chris and Joseph discuss two Canadians China, the subjective nature of complainants and how the legal system introduces bias by referring to complainants as victims prior to a judgement by the court.

Read More

EP #53 | Morality Without Gods

In this episode Dr. Stephen Hicks addressed the philosophical question, does morality require the existence of the gods or a God or is morality part of our human nature?

Read More

EP #140 | Covid-19: The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab

The Great Reset is another example of powerful elites creating a long term process to ensure their continued dominance. The efforts they are unleashing will, in my opinion, turn into considerable violence as a series of political actors take advantage of the situation to advance their own causes. Freedom vs safety and centralized control. Which is more important for you?

Read More

EP#9 | Motives Behind False Accusations

Criminal Defence Lawyer Joseph Neuberger and YouTube personality, legal researcher and host of the UnTrue Crime podcast Diana Davison, sit down and discuss the aftermath of their trials and the emerging and alarming changes to our legal system. A behind the scenes inside look into real court room drama. In this episode Diana, Chris and Joseph discuss some motives behind false accusations.

Read More

EP #51 | Would Immortality Be Worth It

Even though we humans have lots of knowledge, we do not necessarily have a good and full theory of knowledge. Yet we should not let the lack of a good theory, deny the existence of what the theory should be explaining.
Humans have cognitive faculties with limitations. One can form snap judgments, but one can also recognize and pursue the objective principle of viewing as many perspectives as is necessary. One learns about one’s cognitive limitations over time, so one learns that to make a judgment about something beyond one’s immediate cognitive limitation, one needs to do extra work.

Read More

EP#8 | Manufacturing Non-Consent

Criminal Defence Lawyer Joseph Neuberger and YouTube personality, legal researcher and host of the UnTrue Crime podcast Diana Davison, sit down and discuss the aftermath of their trials and the emerging and alarming changes to our legal system. A behind the scenes inside look into real court room drama. Part 2 of The Anatomy of a False Accusation: Manufacturing Non-Consent.

Read More

EP#7 | The Anatomy of a False Accusation

Criminal Defence Lawyer Joseph Neuberger and YouTube personality, legal researcher and host of the UnTrue Crime podcast Diana Davison, sit down and discuss the aftermath of their trials and the emerging and alarming changes to our legal system. A behind the scenes inside look into real court room drama. Do you know someone falsely accused of a crime or sexual assault? How do these cases happen and how are they able to process to trial despite a lack of evidence?

Read More

EP #50 | Objectivity for Human Beings

Even though we humans have lots of knowledge, we do not necessarily have a good and full theory of knowledge. Yet we should not let the lack of a good theory, deny the existence of what the theory should be explaining.
Humans have cognitive faculties with limitations. One can form snap judgments, but one can also recognize and pursue the objective principle of viewing as many perspectives as is necessary. One learns about one’s cognitive limitations over time, so one learns that to make a judgment about something beyond one’s immediate cognitive limitation, one needs to do extra work.

Read More